search

oculus-samples / Unreal-MRUtilityKitSample

MRUK ("Mixed Reality Utility Kit") provides a rich set of utilities/tools on top of Scene API to perform common operations when building spatially-aware apps in Unreal. The Oculus SDK and other supporting material is subject to the Oculus proprietary license.
Other
5 stars 1 forks source link

New MRUK sample for Unreal MetaXR v67 #2

Closed Junnn424 closed 2 weeks ago

Junnn424 commented 1 month ago

Hi! As the new MetaXR plugin came out, in the document it says that the MRUK feature is now being moved into MetaXR plugin. However it seems the current MRUK sample project is still in UE5.3, does this means the sample is still using v65 SDK? Would there be a MRUK sample project in 5.4 using just the MetaXR plugin? We had a project in 5.3 that uses MRUK, as we upgrade to UE5.4 we start to have some package error-- not sure if those are related to MRUK, but do you think there might be any issue for upgrading a MRUK projec to v67 SDK?

Thank you!

MartinSherburn commented 1 month ago

Hi @Junnn424, this sample here works with UE v5.4 and is compatible with v67 SDK. We will update the engine association in the next version, but in the mean time manually changing the EngineAssociation in MRUtilityKitSample.uproject to 5,4 or upgrading it in UE should work fine.

The package error sounds like it may be unrelated but if you suspect it is still related please post more details about that.

Junnn424 commented 1 month ago

Hi @MartinSherburn , Thank you so much for getting back on this! We did figure out the package error in UE54 and had several successful package using MetaXR v67 with MRUK features. However we noticed a significant quality drop with the actor spawning, almost 95% of the time some walls are missing or spawned at wrong place, while the same room scan works just fine in older version. Here is a recording for your reference, the MRUtilityKit Sample project is UE5.4 + MetaXR v.67 and the "Perfomer" app is UE5.3 + MetaXR 64 + MRUK v64: https://youtube.com/shorts/f0J2bX60GBs?feature=share

MRUK_v67_v64

Hopefully it's already under the list in the next update! We would really love to upgrade to v67 to use the much optimized Depth Occlusion but some of these bugs are making us worried.

A couple more things that we found:

felixweilbach commented 1 month ago

Hi @Junnn424,

thanks for the detailed description.

The issues with actor spawning have been discovered internally already and we have fix for it. It will be fixed in the next release.

I will forward the occlusion issue to the team that works on occlusions.

For the crash I think we should prevent that, however if you do not want to spawn any actor remove it from the list instead of specifying None.

Junnn424 commented 4 weeks ago

Thank you @felixweilbach ! Glad to know it's already been taken care of, and thank you so much for the quick response!

For the crash issue, that's indeed what we do-- we cleaned out the "None" from the list and it's running fine ever since. Just mention it because the "None" causing crash issue is also a new thing in v.67, we upgraded from v.65+UE53 and was not having the crash even though we have several "None" in the list.

Thanks again for forwarding the issues!

MartinSherburn commented 3 weeks ago

@hun

  • Depth Occlusion works perfect at the first level, but once we travel to a nother map it starts to render differently on each eye (see pic reference below) recording: https://youtu.be/by_Wx87PESo 2024-08-06T02-52-49 395Z

Thanks for reporting this. Do you think you could create a new issue on https://github.com/oculus-samples/Unreal-OcclusionSample/issues to track this one so as not to mix up several issues in one? From the video it looks like you are using Hard Occlusions, is that right? Have you tried Soft Occlusions, do you see the same issue? Do you know if the issue is caused by travelling to the map, or does the second map have something different from the first? (what happens if you load directly into the second map for example).

Junnn424 commented 3 weeks ago

Hi @MartinSherburn , Sure, I'll create a new ticket there and respond there! New issue: https://github.com/oculus-samples/Unreal-OcclusionSample/issues/5#issue-2473411785

MartinSherburn commented 3 weeks ago

However we noticed a significant quality drop with the actor spawning, almost 95% of the time some walls are missing or spawned at wrong place, while the same room scan works just fine in older version.

@Junnn424 I created a PR which you can pull into your own repository to fix the Scene Loading issue. Please take a look here:

https://github.com/Oculus-VR/UnrealEngine/pull/490

As @felixweilbach mentioned this will be fixed in v69.