Closed vermaete closed 10 years ago
Hi Vermaete!
This breaks this regression for me. However I suspect a tool bug. Did you do this? make make compile make sim
On Questasim 10.0c_2, in the SystemVerilog code, the reg5 gets a default value of 0. Which I believe is wrong. In the VHDL version, reg5 gets the value x, but it means that the testcase fails for the VHDL version.
I could get around it by not testing the un-reseted registers.
Hi,
First at all: thanks for this project.
I've using it for a small embedded-C project where I made the documentation in Sphinx/Restructured text. But I will use it for the next HW stuff too.
I could no run the regression from home. I'm missing Modelsim over here. I will try to run it at my clients site. Although it's not the heavy Modelsim stuff over there. Some Microsemi (ex Actel) OEM version and a strong will to go to Isim of Xilinx.
Anyhow: one of the next project will be on Zynq and I thought Xilinx write somewhere not to use asynchronous resets anymore and just synchronous resets if needed.
I'll keep you informed.
In IP-XACT, the reset element is not mandatory. Added 'reg5' as a copy of 'reg4' but without the 'reset' element.