Open RafaelKr opened 6 months ago
I would like to create a topology of a Point-to-Site network. A simplified version of Fig 3.2 described here: https://www.procustodibus.com/blog/2020/10/wireguard-topologies/#point-to-site
Fig 3.2
This is what I have currently:
So it's not that far from what I would like to have. But I'm missing 2 things to make it more accurate:
I also have an idea for styling tunneled connections:
<path>
- <path fill="none" stroke="#f1cf8a" stroke-width="2" d="M955.6 524.2h211.6m-211.6 0h93.6a5 5 0 0 1 5 5v150a5 5 0 0 0 5 5h108m-211.6-160h93.6a5 5 0 0 0 5-5v-150a5 5 0 0 1 5-5h108"/> + <path fill="none" stroke="#f1cf8a" stroke-width="8" stroke-opacity="0.5" d="M955.6 524.2h211.6m-211.6 0h93.6a5 5 0 0 1 5 5v150a5 5 0 0 0 5 5h108m-211.6-160h93.6a5 5 0 0 0 5-5v-150a5 5 0 0 1 5-5h108"/> + <path fill="none" stroke="#70a5eb" stroke-width="2" d="M955.6 524.2h211.6m-211.6 0h93.6a5 5 0 0 1 5 5v150a5 5 0 0 0 5 5h108m-211.6-160h93.6a5 5 0 0 0 5-5v-150a5 5 0 0 1 5-5h108"/>
Then it would look like
It's still not there yet, because it's not really visible that the connection is wg0 via enp7s0 <=> enp7s0 to wg0 but maybe we could just write it like wg0 via enp7s0.
wg0 via enp7s0 <=> enp7s0 to wg0
wg0 via enp7s0
Would this be possible without to much work?
I would like to create a topology of a Point-to-Site network. A simplified version of
Fig 3.2
described here: https://www.procustodibus.com/blog/2020/10/wireguard-topologies/#point-to-siteThis is what I have currently:
So it's not that far from what I would like to have. But I'm missing 2 things to make it more accurate:
I also have an idea for styling tunneled connections:
<path>
of the connectionThen it would look like
It's still not there yet, because it's not really visible that the connection is
wg0 via enp7s0 <=> enp7s0 to wg0
but maybe we could just write it likewg0 via enp7s0
.Would this be possible without to much work?