Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Same issue here with vim 7.4/tmux 1.9a on Arch Linux.
Original comment by keith.hu...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2014 at 12:46
Same. Vim 7.4 on OS X 10.9.4. This would be an appreciated fix.
Original comment by vitc...@gmail.com
on 17 Jul 2014 at 10:29
Same here, with iTerm2 which uses tmux under the hood.
Original comment by boi...@gmail.com
on 30 Sep 2014 at 10:54
So looks like it's something related to compiling --with-client-server
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/issues/32875
Original comment by boi...@gmail.com
on 4 Oct 2014 at 4:53
Also using --with-client-server. The feature is used by some very useful
plugins (e.g. vim-r: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2628).
Original comment by keith.hu...@gmail.com
on 6 Oct 2014 at 3:55
posted patch here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/d_ezt6jn_jU/Kz4EkVFK1DEJ
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2014 at 7:26
Should be fixed by patch 7.4.523
It's different from Christian's patch, it only restores the connection after it
failed. This is to avoid repeatedly trying to connect when it fails.
Please check if it works.
Original comment by brammool...@gmail.com
on 19 Nov 2014 at 5:51
Hello. I have tried patch 7.4.523
It works very nicely if, you run vim on you local computer and kill your local
X11 server. The local X11 server will start again and everything works fine.
But if you use vim on a server and kill your local X11, then vim will freeze
and stop working. (Even though the local X11 server is relaunched...)
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2014 at 9:52
I haven't had the chance to test the patch yet, but my setup sounds similar --
I usually have vim running in a tmux session on one machine, and then work both
locally from that machine, and remotely from another machine over SSH (with
ForwardX11).
Original comment by keith.hu...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2014 at 11:19
fusionhep: Did you try with Christian's patch instead of patch 7.4.523?
Original comment by brammool...@gmail.com
on 20 Nov 2014 at 10:01
I just tried Christian's patch instead of patch 7.4.523. But it shows the same
behavior of patch 7.4.523. (As I described above.)
These are the steps I took to use Christian's patch.
Since Christian's patch was posted on Oct 8, 2014, I checked out v7_4_463 (Sep
29, 2014).
cd vim
hg checkout v7_4_463
patch -p1 < reconnect_x11.diff
cd src
make distclean
make
make install
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 12:23
Can you update your description on how to freeze Vim? I tried locally with two
different X-Servers and everything worked as expected.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 3:47
These are the steps to freeze the patched vim.
On terminal
1. ssh -Y remoteServer
2. vim (This is done on the remote server)
On your local machine, kill your local X-server. (While vim is running on the
remote server)
On terminal, you will find that vim(on the remote server) doesn't respond any
more.
I have tried this on OSX10.9.5 and on cygwin(Windows). Both show the same
behavior.
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 4:05
Just by random trial and error, I found a rough fix(?) (I have no knowledge
about the code, so this should mess something up?) But I hope this will help.
(From Christian's patch) In os_unix.cc at resetup_term_clip(), add the below
code, (at the start of the method)
if (app_context != (XtAppContext)NULL){
XtDestroyApplicationContext(app_context);
app_context = (XtAppContext)NULL;
}
If you do so, then vim seems to work on remote servers.
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 6:44
I do not understand. If I ssh -Y remote server and then start vim and then kill
my local X server, then vim will be terminated, right?
Perhaps you can build a debug build of vim and then start that debug Vim
session and when Vim freezes connect with gdb to it (gdb --pid=pid of vim) and
then show the output of the bt command of gdb.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 7:40
If I kill my local X server... vim will(is) not be terminated.
If I used xterm to ssh -Y remote server, run vim, then kill my local X-server,
xterm(and vim) will be terminated.
If I used a "terminal" to ssh -Y remote server, run gvim, then kill my local
X-server, gvim will be terminated.
But since I am using a "terminal" to ssh -Y remote server, run vim... I do not
think vim should terminate if my local X-server is terminated.
Here is bt command of gdb when vim(patched) is frozen.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000003411ccc30f in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x000000341642c80a in _XtWaitForSomething () from /usr/lib64/libXt.so.6
#2 0x000000341642d1ff in XtAppPending () from /usr/lib64/libXt.so.6
#3 0x00000000004e6994 in xterm_update () at os_unix.c:7086
#4 0x00000000004e7ca9 in setup_term_clip () at os_unix.c:6909
#5 0x00000000004e7d7a in resetup_term_clip () at os_unix.c:6808
#6 0x00000000004e8115 in RealWaitForChar (fd=0, msec=0, check_for_gpm=<value
optimized out>)
at os_unix.c:5434
#7 0x00000000004e8291 in mch_breakcheck () at os_unix.c:5082
#8 0x00000000004898b5 in vgetorpeek (advance=1) at getchar.c:2074
#9 0x000000000048a7aa in vgetc () at getchar.c:1638
#10 0x0000000000584925 in main_loop (cmdwin=0, noexmode=0) at main.c:1141
#11 0x0000000000587773 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value
optimized out>)
at main.c:1042
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 21 Nov 2014 at 8:41
Now I think I understand. This is my OS setup.
local machine: Mac or Windows(Cygwin)
remote server: Linux
If my local machine was Linux, then If I closed the local X-server then that
would mean the GUI of OS would be closed. But in other OSs, that would not be
the case.
Then let me tell you how you can freeze vim(on remote server) with a local
machine being linux.
1. ssh -Y remote server
2. tmux (or screen)
3. vim
4. detach from tmux (or screen)
5. reboot you local machine or reboot your local X-server
6. ssh -Y remote server
7. attach tmux(or screen)
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 22 Nov 2014 at 2:05
Thanks, I'll try to reproduce it. Unfortunately, I currently do not have a
remote system with an X Server available. But in any case, this looks like a
problem in the X11 libraries (_XtWaitForSomething()). I am not sure, there is
much that Vim can do against.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 23 Nov 2014 at 1:22
Here is another way to show the same behavior with one machine.
1. Change runmode of Linux to multi-user text mode. (For RedHat, Edit
/etc/inittab. For Ubuntu, depends on version.)
2. Reboot machine.
3. Login
4. startx (For Ubuntu, depends on version. Might need to start service gdm or
lightdm.)
5. (In GUI terminal) tmux
6. (In GUI terminal) vim
7. Logout (This will return you to text mode)
8. startx (For Ubuntu, depends on version. Might need to start service gdm or
lightdm.)
9. (In GUI termianl) tmux attach
You will find that vim is frozen.
Yes. I also think that it might by a problem with the X11 libraries.
But for some reason, if you add
if (app_context != (XtAppContext)NULL){
XtDestroyApplicationContext(app_context);
app_context = (XtAppContext)NULL;
}
to the begining of resetup_term_clip() in os_unix.c, vim doesn't freeze.
So I naively thought that there might be way to work around the X11 library
problem(?).
If you have any trouble in reproducing the problem, please tell me what Linux
version you use.
Original comment by fusion...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2014 at 5:41
If that works, than good. I cannot reproduce the problem with neither linux
mint 17 nor with a debian testing system. Nevertheless, I noticed, that
sometimes the Clipboard connection is not reset. (probably because the flag
xterm_dpy_was_reset was reset to zero before trying to establish a X11
connection). So it might be a good idea to have a command to manually force a
X11 connection.
Original comment by chrisbr...@googlemail.com
on 25 Nov 2014 at 6:53
I'm still affected by the "Nothing in register * problem" on vim 7.4-621 and
tmux 1.9a. Have this patch been merged yet?
Original comment by alexandr...@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2015 at 6:40
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fusion...@gmail.com
on 6 Mar 2014 at 1:06