Closed koido closed 1 year ago
Hi Olivier,
I found a potential inconsistency between the Avg phaseQ value in the usage and the actual values observed in the logs.
The Documentation states, "We usually expect values above 0.8 or even 0.9." However, I noticed that my actual log values are much larger (over 90).
Upon examining the code, the phaseQ calculation appears to produce values in the range of 0 to 99.
I suspect the description of the phaseQ value range might be "above 80 or even 90" instead of "0.8 or even 0.9." Is my interpretation correct?
I'm using v5.1.0.
Many thanks again.
Best, Masaru
Thanks for spotting this. I updated the documentation accordingly.
Many thanks for the update!
Hi Olivier,
I found a potential inconsistency between the Avg phaseQ value in the usage and the actual values observed in the logs.
The Documentation states, "We usually expect values above 0.8 or even 0.9." However, I noticed that my actual log values are much larger (over 90).
Upon examining the code, the phaseQ calculation appears to produce values in the range of 0 to 99.
I suspect the description of the phaseQ value range might be "above 80 or even 90" instead of "0.8 or even 0.9." Is my interpretation correct?
I'm using v5.1.0.
Many thanks again.
Best, Masaru