[ADD] arm64v8 images

[derfl0]

Add specific arm64v8 images to allow native Odoo execution on arm architecture (e.g. M1)

[semihalf-mazur-hubert]

Hi, any updates about merging PR and providing official arm64 docker images?

[FaisalJulaidan]

Go ahead please and merge

[leimantas]

RUN WKH_VERSION=$([ "$(uname -m)" = 'aarch64' ] && echo "arm64" || echo "amd64") \
    && curl -o wkhtmltox.deb -sSL https://github.com/wkhtmltopdf/packaging/releases/download/0.12.6-1/wkhtmltox_0.12.6-1.buster_${WKH_VERSION}.deb \
    && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends ./wkhtmltox.deb \
    && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* wkhtmltox.deb

[AaronBeaudoin]

This is increasingly a very important addition for Odoo developers on macOS.

I'm currently having to write my own scripts to modify the official Dockerfile so that I can build my images natively.

[jeffryjdelarosa]

I already made the same problems , Please merge it

[derfl0]

For anyone stumbling across this issue. I am now using GitHub actions (branch: build_action) to build the images automatically: https://hub.docker.com/r/fbieringer/odoo

Feel free to use. I try to keep everything up to date.

[jeffryjdelarosa]

@derfl0 Thanks so much 😍, do you have the Debbug settings with VScode, please I cloud pay it for it.

[derfl0]

@derfl0 Thanks so much 😍, do you have the Debbug settings with VScode, please I cloud pay it for it.

https://github.com/derfl0/odoo_vscode_template

If you need more help with Odoo development, feel free to contact me via contact@bytist.de

[d-fence]

I'm sorry to say that it will not work. The only supported wkhtmltopdf version is 0.12.5-1.

[leimantas]

We use 0.12.6 for 2 years now. Everything works. No problems. Odoo 13,14,16. Arm based debian.

[derfl0]

@d-fence @leimantas i can also confirm that I never had problems developing on my M1 using 12.6. Lately I was working on a lot of reports and never had any trouble. Of course this does not mean that it is perfectly fine but I would also argue that as long as there is no known issue one could assume that 12.6 in fact works as intended.

I am also pretty fine, if the arm images I compile ( https://hub.docker.com/r/fbieringer/odoo ) are defined as "unofficial" but maybe you could reference them somewhere on the official page so one could stumble across them.

It would also be really great, if you could externalise ODOO_RELEASE and ODOO_SHA from the Dockerimage so that it can be used for both images without requiring changes in the actual Dockerfile every time the source code is updated.

[leimantas]

@derfl0 you can build multiarch odoo images https://hub.docker.com/r/wbms/odoo-16.0/tags

[derfl0]

@derfl0 you can build multiarch odoo images https://hub.docker.com/r/wbms/odoo-16.0/tags

That is true but I see no need to compile for amd64 since there is an official image for that and I would not try to mislead anyone into using an unofficial image just because they are lazy ;)

[ludovic-gasc]

Hi,

I made an attempt to support ARM for Odoo with another approach with this pull request: #466

I'm interested in your feedback.

[ludovic-gasc]

Hi all,

You can now test the ARM support of Odoo with the official container image: https://hub.docker.com/search?q=odoo&image_filter=official

Kind regards