Closed mariapoveda closed 3 years ago
Not sure if wikidata should be considered as an ontology... but I won't judge
@to do @dgarijo to implement the service test that gives kudos if they are used.
added the following:
"http://www.ifomis.org/bfo/1.1#",
"http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/DUL.owl",
"http://emmo.info/emmo/top#",
"http://sw.cyc.com/2006/07/27/cyc/",
"http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo.owl#",
"http://www.onto-med.de/ontologies/gfo-basic.owl#",
"https://schema.org/",
"http://www.hozo.jp/owl/YAMATO20210604.miz.owl#"
I couldn't find the rest (I omitted Wikidata). If we are to add more, please add the URL
We agreed on looking for foundational ontologies. Here there is a proposal @dgarijo