ITI-18 QueryResponse - QueryResponseTransformer submissionSet to ebXml missing objectType attribute in Classification element

[cyrillzadra]

Hi all,

I am currently investigating a problem where the ITI-18 GetSubmissionSet returns a SubmissionSet containing a classification element without the attribute "objectType."

<Classification classifiedObject="urn:uuid:199493bb-6098-45d8-8bc2-2db313765df4" 
      classificationNode="urn:uuid:a54d6aa5-d40d-43f9-88c5-b4633d873bdd" 
      id="urn:uuid:8710e0f2-4ae0-4ba2-8fb4-87ed922b7844"/>

The mapping of SubmissionSet to ebXml seems to be happening here -> QueryResponseTransformer

Shouldn't a registry in the ITI-18 response have "Classification.objectType" set? Reading through the IHE spec, I found the following definition for "Classification/@objectType":

"Fixed value as specified by ebRIM. Optional upon submission of objects, required upon retrieval. If set, the value shall be urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-regrep:ObjectType:RegistryObject:Classification."

https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/TF/Volume3/ch-4.2.html#4.2.1.2.1 - Table "4.2.1.2.1-1: XML encoding of SubmissionSet Classification"

Thanks & regards, Cyrill

[Thopap]

Hello @cyrillzadra ,

i think you are right. Interesting to see such findings even after years of connectathons :-) (since there is no real need for this attribute at all) I have done a short validation of a FindSubmissionSet with the EVS tool: https://gazelle.ihe.net/evs/report.seam?oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.11.4.8416

Even the IHE EVS validator did not indicate that topic. The Rule 43 seems to only validate the objectType of classifications "if present".

I will slightly adjust our response rendering to address this topic.

Best regards, Thomas

[cyrillzadra]

I have done a short validation of a FindSubmissionSet with the EVS tool: https://gazelle.ihe.net/evs/report.seam?oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.12559.11.11.4.8416

Even the IHE EVS validator did not indicate that topic. The Rule 43 seems to only validate the objectType of classifications "if present".

Yeah validated an example against evs tool as well and it confused me even more because it said 'if present' in rule 43:-).

I will slightly adjust our response rendering to address this topic.

Cool thanks. If you don't find time just let me know. I can try to publish this change as pr.

regards Cyrill

[cyrillzadra]

Wow that was fast ... thanks👍

[Thopap]

Slighly extend that issue, since the objectType was misssing for RegistryPackage and ExternalIdentifier as well.