Feature/integrate tsam no multiple timegrid storage

[Maxhi77]

Added possibility to have diverse storage with and without inter_storage_content in tsam mode.

For this purpose, multiple_time_grid has been added to generic_storage. The naming can be improved in the future.

[pep8speaks]

Hello @Maxhi77! Thanks for opening this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found:

• In the file src/oemof/solph/components/_generic_storage.py:

Line 511:9: E306 expected 1 blank line before a nested definition, found 0 Line 539:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters) Line 546:80: E501 line too long (115 > 79 characters) Line 557:80: E501 line too long (96 > 79 characters) Line 558:70: E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent Line 558:80: E501 line too long (95 > 79 characters) Line 560:80: E501 line too long (84 > 79 characters) Line 561:25: E117 over-indented Line 562:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters) Line 772:21: E122 continuation line missing indentation or outdented

[henhuy]

Thanks @Maxhi77 - will have a look.

[Maxhi77]

I just saw I forgot to add the possibility for investment, which I am going to do now.

[Maxhi77]

I see a logical fault in my approach, I do not know to solve in this moment.

For a storage with a multiple_tsam_timegrid:

for n in group:
   if n.multiple_tsam_timegrid:
      self.storage_content_inter = Var(
          self.STORAGES, m.CLUSTERS_OFFSET, within=NonNegativeReals
      )
      self.storage_content_intra = Var(
          self.STORAGES, m.TIMEINDEX_TYPICAL_CLUSTER_OFFSET
      )
   else:
      self.storage_content_intra = Var(
          self.STORAGES, m.TIMEINDEX_TYPICAL_CLUSTER_OFFSET,
          bounds=_storage_content_bound_intra_rule
      )

When I understand oemof correctly, the GenericStorageBlock is for all storages the same. Right now the last storage of the group would define in which if statment is true, which affects all storages. In my case I want to define variables differently, if multiple_tsam_timegrid is True. All solutions I am thinking about are linked to a lot of changes.

Do you have an idea?

[henhuy]

You are right, it's not that simple. I only see two options:

1. split storages internally like this is done for balanced storages in https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/b00fd5f975dc72646e431d65bc07c650ace2bfd3/src/oemof/solph/components/_generic_storage.py#L474 In this case all variables would have to be changed whether they depend on your new generated Set or the original set.
2. Create a new block class which inherits from GenericStorageBlock and overwrite some of the initialization functions to your needs. Then in GeneriStorage at https://github.com/oemof/oemof-solph/blob/b00fd5f975dc72646e431d65bc07c650ace2bfd3/src/oemof/solph/components/_generic_storage.py#L328 you have to define which block shall be used, depending on your boolean variable multiple_tsam_timegrid. This seems a bit easier IMO

[Maxhi77]

Thanks for the answer. I had the first possibility in mind, but thought it is quite complex.

The second one sounds easier, but might be not clean and fancied by reviewers. Therefore I am going to link them (@gnn @p-snft ) for their opinion.