Closed gplssm closed 3 years ago
Thank you for your effort. I really like the table with the packages :+1:
But I would copy the existing text into the new chapters. I think it is easier to build the new text on old fragments than writing a new one.
"about oemof" to "Open Energy Modelling Framework (oemof)" "Developing oemof" and "Contributing" to "Contributing"
What's your opinion on that?
Thank you for your effort. I really like the table with the packages +1
But I would copy the existing text into the new chapters. I think it is easier to build the new text on old fragments than writing a new one.
"about oemof" to "Open Energy Modelling Framework (oemof)" "Developing oemof" and "Contributing" to "Contributing"
What's your opinion on that?
Thanks for pointing this out again! In general, I agree with you. Don't re-invent the wheel... But, the text is partiallly outdated, belonging to oemof-solph, too specific while information is already available elsewhere. Therefore, I go the extra step and create new text based on the existing as decribed in https://github.com/oemof/oemof/issues/69#issuecomment-695925822
Merging #81 (b7eadd8) into master (3c7708e) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #81 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 3 3
Lines 8 8
=========================================
Hits 8 8
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3c7708e...b7eadd8. Read the comment docs.
Hey @uvchik, can I ask you for a quick review of the updated docs. I think it's quite a valuable improvement compared to the outdated docs that are shown at the moment.
Fix #69
See the updated documentation here
What was changed
Points for discussion
Everyone in addition to the assigned reviewer @uvchik is welcome to discuss this PR!