Open maurerdietmar opened 2 years ago
yes ... if you want things in sync, what is the advantage of rrdcached ?
1.) we want a cache and journal to speedup read/writes
2.) we do not want to loose any data on power failures (that is whats the journal for (usually))
yes :) I guess an optional fsync for the journal would be ok :) if you want to PR ...
Seems that rrdcached does not make sure that data is written to disk, not even the journal is synced to disk. I am unable to find and calls to fsync, syncfs, fdatasync ...
So I assume that a considerable amount of data can be lost on power failures.
Or do I miss something and data is synced by some other means?