Closed syswipe closed 2 years ago
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Hi, regarding ACL's in the destination filesystem (that you applied to files/dirs), these are likely overwritten by the snapshots you received - if they did not have similar ACLs on the source. I am not sure if the same applies to all or some dataset properties (including the "allow" one) - it may be that you'd have to add "receive" and "hold" on the origin as well.
One alternative may be to create a destination dataset where you have applied all the needed inheritable rights for "backup" to manipulate (maybe it and) its children, and then receive regular replications into a child dataset.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Hi. I tried to setup a backup task with znapzend on Solaris 11.4 and I observe a bit of strange behavior. What exactly I do. I created separate unprivileged user: backup Source host settings:
also, I added the next extended ACL on the DST host as described in Solaris ZFS documentation:
Backup plan:
When i run a runonce backup all is OK, but when I created a child dataset on the source I got the next
The result is: znapzend clears extended ACLs on destination data/enc/backup, so the backup user can't mount subdirs:
It may prevent child datasets to be backed up.