IFA mortars are very weak

[jaj22]

IFA mortars are much less accurate, and the shells deal less damage at lower radius than the vanilla mortar. I think this is probably an intentional adjustment for targets being unarmoured, as the difference in damage taken between an unarmoured unit and one with a carrier lite is ~9x. However, it probably goes a bit too far and may need adjustment.

Comparison:

B_Mortar_01_F (weapon: mortar_82mm, ammo: Sh_82mm_AMOS) artilleryDispersion 1.9, all modes indirectHit 52 indirectHitRange 18

LIB_GrWr34 (weapon: LIB_GRWR34, ammo: LIB_Sh_82_HE) artilleryDispersion 6/8/10 (close/med/far) indirectHit 21 indirectHitRange 8

LIB_M2_60 (weapon: LIB_M2_60, ammo: LIB_Sh_60_HE) artilleryDispersion 4/6/8 (close/med/far) indirectHit 15.3 indirectHitRange 5.8

[jaj22]

Ok, ran the numbers and checked against reality:

Lethal radius of Mk6 vs standing rifleman (carrier lite + combat helmet): 34.9m Lethal radius of GrWr34 vs standing unarmoured IFA unit: 21.7m

So the IFA mortars are far less dangerous, even before accounting for the terrible accuracy.

[jaj22]

Confirmed that artilleryDispersion is proportional to shell distance travelled, so "far" on the mk6 is much less accurate than "close". I think there's a fair argument that the mk6 is overly accurate, but I don't see the logic for the IFA mortars being that bad. Maybe I'll just put them on a flat 4.