Open ghost opened 3 years ago
yes, i wonder about the same. are SRV queries TLSA and CNAME possible?
in my example a third TXT entry is missing regarding the DKIM entry. Is there a limit on entries shown?
I'd like to suggest a -F flag which shows all available DNS information ?
dog google.com -t TXT A AAAA MX NS SRV TLSA --colour=always
does this output every available info ?
Thanks :+1:
Same problem for me, trying to lookup some TXT record that are included for a SPF record which contain underscores.
yeah, dog CNAME _acme-challenge.xxxxx
reports the domain as invalid, but the _
is valid for CNAMEs (but only when the CNAME is not being treated as a host name, similar to a TXT record)
I found this answer helpful in understanding the nuance here: https://serverfault.com/a/928204/196152
The TLDR summary is that hostnames are greatly restricted in valid characters, but domain names are not. A CNAME record can be both, so dog should not validate these the same way as A records.
Hi, is there a limitation in
dog
that doesn't allow this:Or am I using it wrong?
dog
gives the error:But underscores are a normal part of SRV queries, from what I gathered by reading https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2782. Thank you.