search

ohbm / hackathon2019

Website and projects for the OHBM Hackathon in Rome 2019
https://ohbm.github.io/hackathon2019
81 stars 61 forks source link

Turning the tutorial list into its own standalone repo #102

Open Remi-Gau opened 5 years ago

Remi-Gau commented 5 years ago

Hey.

@martinagvilas @complexbrains and I were thinking of taking the tutorial list file and turning it into its own standalone repo and make it easier to navigate (read-the-docs, bookdown,... ?).

Is there such a project already in progress or a similar initiative so that we don't "compete"?

Tagging here all the contributors to the tutorial list file: @katjaq @r03ert0 @raamana @rutgerfick @danjgale @manojneuro @crocodoyle @jdkent @pbellec @avakiai

gkiar commented 5 years ago

Hey @Remi-Gau ! A couple years ago I got excited and tried to start something like this, but kinda ran out of steam populating things. It lives at https://brainhack101.github.io/neurolinks/, and different types of resources can be sorted into different tables, etc...

I'm very pro this list going somewhere more "permanent", and perhaps making something like the neurolinks project work would be a nice way to do it? Happy to give anybody write access to that repo or org, if it's useful.

dnkennedy commented 5 years ago

[Slightly Self Serving Warning...] I also was thinking that something more 'databasey' would be helpful. I as trying to think how NITRC could be useful for this (to promote discovery of specific resources, certainly... But, haven't come up with a specific idea yet, but wanted to chime in with a +1...

Remi-Gau commented 5 years ago

Hey @Remi-Gau ! A couple years ago I got excited and tried to start something like this, but kinda ran out of steam populating things. It lives at https://brainhack101.github.io/neurolinks/, and different types of resources can be sorted into different tables, etc...

I'm very pro this list going somewhere more "permanent", and perhaps making something like the neurolinks project work would be a nice way to do it? Happy to give anybody write access to that repo or org, if it's useful.

The neurolinks is super useful but sort of does assume one vaguely knows what he/she is looking for. I think that we have in mind more structured according to a typical workflow for a study.

But I think that the 2 approaches are complementary: I think we will try to keep neurolinks in mind when we list out ressources. If it can lead to some sort of databasey approach that can be easily exploited by neurolinks, even better.