Open alabarga opened 3 years ago
the cohort table in the CDM looks like
cohort_definition_id | subject_id | cohort_start_date | cohort_end_date |
---|---|---|---|
1009 | 4579522779730604891 | 2020-02-09 | 2020-02-09 |
1009 | 6731742195644174274 | 2020-02-08 | 2020-02-10 |
1009 | 3688281720704476065 | 2020-08-28 | 2020-08-28 |
Perhaps the exposure cohorts are empty? Could you check your cohort_counts.csv
file to see if any of the exposure cohorts (e.g. 'Hydroxychloroquine with Treatment administered on the date of admission of hospitalization and prior to intensive services and 365d prior observation') has a non-NA count?
Also, could you check if any of these files exist? (in the same folder as cohort_counts.csv
)?:
not all, but some have non-NA values
cohort_id | name | cohort_entries | cohort_subjects | database_id |
---|---|---|---|---|
1001000011 | Hydroxychloroquine with Treatment administered on the date of admission of hospitalization and prior to intensive services and 365d prior observation | 313 | 313 | hdm |
1002000011 | Hydroxychloroquine + Azithromycin with Treatment administered on the date of admission of hospitalization and prior to intensive services and 365d prior observation | 18 | 18 | hdm |
however, no *.rds files are present
So the problem appears to be that most exposure cohorts are either empty or very small, leaving no comparisons with sufficient data.
This study package doesn't really allow you to find out why there are so few people meeting the cohort criteria. Did you run ScyllaCharacterization?
We are facing this error running the study, any ideas? Find attached generated errorReportR.txt