Closed mgrojo closed 1 year ago
I directly fixed the non-controversial issues and have made pull requests with the ones requiring review.
These are the only remaining issues if everything is merged:
README.md:1:1: The repository should have "awesome-list" as a GitHub topic remark-lint:awesome-github
This can be solved adding the corresponding tag, that can only be done by the owner.
README.md:194:3: https://matrix.to/#/#ada-lang_Lobby:gitter.im remark-lint:double-link
README.md:202:112: https://matrix.to/#/#ada-lang:matrix.org remark-lint:double-link
These seem like a bug in how the linter interprets URLs. See https://github.com/Scrum/remark-lint-double-link/pull/10
There's still a pending issue reported by the linter:
README.md:1:1 ✖ 1:1 The repository should have "awesome-list" as a GitHub topic remark-lint:awesome-github
@ohenley I think this can only be fixed by you.
@ohenley hace you missed this? It should only take a minute.
Yep missed it. Did add "awesome-list" as a GitHub topic.
Great! Everything is passing now, except a timeout in https://www.ada-europe.org/ which I hope is a transitory problem. Closing this, thanks.
The awesome-lint program has run for the first time; I wasn't aware of those issues. It seems the link checker was aborting the action.
https://github.com/ohenley/awesome-ada/actions/runs/4267389929/jobs/7428942700
There are some legitimate and important issues to be fixed:
Other puristic ones, but easy to solve.
A few looks like there's some bug in awesome-lint.
And finally, other ones that I'm not sure if they should be solved: either because they would affect presentation or because we would lose something, like a second link to the same URL. It doesn't like either the out-of-place links that I precisely included to centralize the URL, so I don't see a solution for those.
I'll try to clean the important and easy ones, and we should discuss the remaining: whether there's a way to fix them, the rule can be disabled or the lint has to be removed altogether.