Closed raufs closed 1 year ago
Hi, Sorry for the slow response. Below is the expected result for the test set
Cluster SMEG Coverage No of SNPs SMEG range cluster1 1.75370127210152 4.08426832179518 10971 1.683 - 1.808 cluster2 1.12409093832417 2.08503190107843 9164 1.114 - 1.169
Thanks. Tunde
Thank you Tunde!
It appears I see similar trends in the results but differences in the values beyond simple rounding error. For instance, I also get that cluster1 has a higher SMEG value than cluster2. I ended up installing through conda and manual tinkering of certain steps in the pipeline, so perhaps I broke something in the process.
Also, I saw it was recommended that we use the Singularity instance, however, it seems that the instance provided might not be compatible with the new Singularity version (at least that's what I interpreted the issue as). Would it be possible to update the Singularity instance/container to work with the latest version?
My exact results are the following:
Cluster SMEG Coverage No of SNPs SMEG range cluster1 1.49942916402499 1.21812828266752 5090 1.416 - 1.517 cluster2 1.17742009741453 2.70058155948281 11114 1.139 - 1.199
Kind regards, Rauf
Hi,
Thank you for developing such a really great method and very cool study too!
I am wondering if it is possible to share the expected results of the test dataset provided to help check if we have SMEG set up correctly?
Kind regards, Rauf