Closed evdokim closed 10 years ago
I would like to discuss it, because I would like to start preparing slides
metapasta; it's only about naming I don't know exactly what are we doing with this. @rtobes ?
Please include here the link to the abstract (or the abstract) that we finally sent.
In my opinion we have to present MG7 because the abstract is about MG7 with the use of NISPERO for the BLAST part but after that @evdokim can present metapasta as a new fast way to do screening of samples to detect contamination or basic taxonomic assignments that allow to use LAST for alignment improving the execution time. In summary Metapasta as a very quick assignment tool for screening of samples.
but MG7 doesn't use nispero, isn't it?
Sorry, you are rigth we are doing in the last projects the BLAST part with metapasta. I have corrected the previous message.
But in the sent abstract is mentioned NISPERO. Does Metapasta based on NISPERO?
yes, metapasta based on some advanced version of nispero
The abstract was written for the planned state of metapasta as of the conference date.
Some of these features are not implemented at this stage.
About the name, we kept MG7 as some sort of umbrella for metagenomics analysis
OK
let's discuss it. I want to clarify following:
@eparejatobes @rtobes can you take a look on my slides? also can we add to this repository @marina-manrique?
BTW, @pablopareja doesn't have access to this repo tampoco
@laughedelic I think this repo is public
Ok, anyway Pablo answered me by email already
@evdokim @laughedelic I'll read it today
What we actually are going to present at IWBBIO? Metapasta or MG7?