Closed laughedelic closed 8 years ago
I've checked the lineage (using Bio4j locally) of these three, which had same direct and accumulated counts (the first one haven't accumulated the descendants' counts):
lineage (IDs) | |
---|---|
Streptococcus agalactiae | 1, 131567, 2, 1783272, 1239, 91061, 186826, 1300, 1301, 1311 |
Streptococcus agalactiae FSL S3-608 | 1, 131567, 2, 1783272, 1239, 91061, 186826, 1300, 1301, 1311, 1154778 |
Streptococcus agalactiae H36B | 1, 131567, 2, 1783272, 1239, 91061, 186826, 1300, 1301, 1311, 342615 |
And you can see that the lineage is correct. So I'm going to test the count algorithm and see what's the problem with it.
I think I know what's the problem, but I'm still writing some simple tests.
This is supposedly fixed. We can try it on the mock data.
This fix is published under 1.0.0-M3-5c435ad
version.
OK. After the testing (https://github.com/era7bio/mg7-test/issues/12#issuecomment-213997955) it seems to be fixed. Merging.
Some inconsistencies in the accumulated counts were discovered.