Closed gvwilson closed 7 years ago
I shall look at this tomorrow.
I merged because I did a first-pass edit of the whole thing today on paper. I think we need to reorder the rules: 1, 2, 10, 3, 7/6, 5, 4, 9, 8. Also 6 and 7 are basically identical so I was thinking we need another. how about "make sure older released versions are available"?
I shall look at this tomorrow.
Thanks.
I merged because I did a first-pass edit of the whole thing today on paper.
Whoops - does that mean I converted an out-of-date Markdown? Easy enough to re-convert if so.
I think we need to reorder the rules: 1, 2, 10, 3, 7/6, 5, 4, 9, 8. Also 6 and 7 are basically identical so I was thinking we need another. how about "make sure older released versions are available"?
+1. Do we move discussion of semantic into that new rule?
Whoops - does that mean I converted an out-of-date Markdown? Easy enough to re-convert if so.
All my changes were made on paper thus far. I started on the Markdown intro already but I'll merge the LaTeX and copy them over again there.
Do we move discussion of semantic into that new rule?
The last paragraph of the #10 could form the body of the rule. Not sure how much more needs to be said. I'll merge this and then work on the changes I made.
Desperately needs more of a bibliography, but it's looking good.