this is triggered by get_reference_file, see below for more details. It seems like JWST has no issues passing a Data model to get_reference_file, however, it seems we can only pass a string. We need to understand where this issue is coming from.
701a431 I see how this stems from an assumption that get_reference_file expects a filename, not a DataModel. Should we override get_reference_file to accept both?
they are doing the same, feeding the input model to get_reference_file, why does it work for them and not for us?
I think that at some point in the class hierarchy we are using different classes but have not understood where.
The workaround is this commit:
https://github.com/oirlab/liger_iris_pipeline/pull/58/commits/701a431a0ed01e138776ab4098ed29cb513c353f
this is triggered by
get_reference_file, see below for more details. It seems like JWST has no issues passing a Data model to get_reference_file, however, it seems we can only pass a string. We need to understand where this issue is coming from.There is something I do not understand here, maybe you can track it down, see here: https://github.com/spacetelescope/jwst/blob/10501f22def0460b15df65cd5261601c6a71d7cf/jwst/dark_current/dark_current_step.py#L32
they are doing the same, feeding the input model to get_reference_file, why does it work for them and not for us? I think that at some point in the class hierarchy we are using different classes but have not understood where.
_Originally posted by @zonca in https://github.com/oirlab/liger_iris_pipeline/issues/58#issuecomment-2181593872_