Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Good idea, but I think we should rely on Django's cache backend, which supports
both memcached and Redis, instead of doing an ad-hoc backend mechanism, what do
you think?
Patches more than welcome.
Original comment by mbonetti
on 27 Mar 2011 at 7:56
Yes. I think to use Djando's cache backend will be perfect.
Original comment by a.vostrjakov
on 28 Mar 2011 at 6:00
Attaching a heavy patch to implement two backends: DB (like it works now) and
Django cache. This patch also included my previous patch from
http://code.google.com/p/django-simple-captcha/issues/detail?id=46
All backends functionality is in backends folder. Only small comment: because
memcached and others has 'expired' functionality included I don't implement it
in my cache backend.
Original comment by a.vostrjakov
on 28 Mar 2011 at 12:20
Attachments:
Thank you for this patch, it looks very promising. I have three test cases
failing when using the cache backend: I'll take a look and see if I can fix
them.
Also, ideally, it'd be great if we could avoid creating database tables when
using the cache backend, but I understand this would be very tricky, what do
you think?
Original comment by mbonetti
on 28 Mar 2011 at 12:58
Really I don't check tests :) Only check cache backend on my blog.
About avoiding to create database tables: I think it is enough to say about it
in installation description. if user included 'captcha' in INCLUDED_APPS I
think it is really tricky to forbidden creation of tables when './manage.py
syncdb' is executed.
P.S. Of cource, I'm really interesting to include my patches in source code :)
So, If I can help someway. I'm ready.
Original comment by a.vostrjakov
on 28 Mar 2011 at 1:14
I fixed tests. Really was one bug. Now all tests is passed. But I switching off
the test for expired field of cache-backend because it's integrated
functionality of memcached and other caches.
I hope, now patch can be included :)
Original comment by a.vostrjakov
on 29 Mar 2011 at 9:28
Attachments:
Thanks. I'm a bit busy at the moment, but will give your patch another run in a
few hours
Original comment by mbonetti
on 29 Mar 2011 at 9:37
Hi!
Just remind you :) May be my patch above will be included in the project.
Original comment by a.vostrjakov
on 4 Oct 2011 at 7:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
a.vostrjakov
on 27 Mar 2011 at 4:30