Closed jtemporal closed 5 years ago
Hey, on this docker-compose is better to make a local build or to use the pre-built docker image from docker hub?
the idea is to use the okbr/serenata-notebooks
image :wink:
Thanks for letting me know.
Is there any reason for us to use continuum/miniconda3
as base image instead of some more specific jupyter image like any of jupyter-docker-stacks ?
@thiagoalmeidasa because the jupyter ones were very heavy, the miniconda one gives an image with half the weight :wink:
can i start working on dockerising this and docker-compose.yml. is this ticket closed
Hi @JinnaBalu @thiagoalmeidasa has already started working on that at #18 maybe you can step over there and help giving feedback? that would be awesome :wink:
Hi @jtemporal , I can write docker-compose and instruction for dockerisation. I see the codebase dependent deployment. If you allow me i can start on that, merge @thiagoalmeidasa changes so that i can start or. or i can start without depending on @thiagoalmeidasa chnages.
@JinnaBalu go ahead, just keep in mind that we already have an image on docker hub to facilitate things and it would be awesome if it was a better one :smile:
looking forward to this PR
@jtemporal Created the PR https://github.com/okfn-brasil/notebooks/pull/20
I'm closing this one because docker compose file and necessary documentation was created... I believe further discussions should be carried out in a new issue ;)
thank you all
What is the problem?
The docker command to run jupyter server isn't very friendly. Maybe write a docker-compose too and give that option would be better.
How can this be addressed?
Checkout the docker-compose documentatiomn
Who could help with this issue?
me o/