oldmoe / litestack

MIT License
1.02k stars 56 forks source link

Require Litekd #123

Closed bopm closed 1 month ago

bopm commented 1 month ago

I would like to use it :)

oldmoe commented 1 month ago

It is not ready yet for public consumption! Should be ready by the next release, until then, you require it individually if you want to try it.

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 17:52, Sergey Moiseev @.***> wrote:

I would like to use it :)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

https://github.com/oldmoe/litestack/pull/123 Commit Summary

File Changes

(1 file https://github.com/oldmoe/litestack/pull/123/files)

Patch Links:

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/oldmoe/litestack/pull/123, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEQZVFB2TS4N5OPMQLI7DZLVKCFAVCNFSM6AAAAABKVGKJBWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQYDCMJSGI2TMMA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

bopm commented 1 month ago

I suspected that, but it will only affect someone if that one has a module with the same name or will use include Litekb::Attibutes in the model, ain’t it?

oldmoe commented 1 month ago

you are actually right, I will merge then, please be aware that there could be bugs.

bopm commented 1 month ago

So far so good for unique lists.