Open gnufinder opened 8 years ago
gnu(259083319343897905)=2017 shows at least the existence of moa(2017).
@gnufinder: thanks, this is interesting! I think these kinds of conjectures are good motivations to decide which numbers to try first. Clearly, we are now less interested in such suggestions <10K since not much left there, but when it comes to 10-50K or 50+K then they certainly help.
I haven't yet made up my mind whether it's better to post this as an issue or on wiki, so decided to leave it open there for a while...
Inspired by this site : https://www.math.auckland.ac.nz/~obrien/research/gnu.pdf I determined the numbers m upto 500, which are not among the gnu-values based on the currently known gnu's upto 50000. In other words, there is no n upto 50000 for which gnu(n)=m is known to be true. The first such number n is 33. The given link shows the moa's upto 100. If the value is not proven, a guess is made (the smallest cubefree number with the property). Only the guess for 73 is the smallest squarefree number with the property.
The "missing gnu's" are :
If gnu(n) has one of those values, n must satisfy lb(n)<500 (https://github.com/alex-konovalov/gnu/issues/74) The values n upto 50000 with lb(n)<500 are :
I also search moa(2016) (definition see the link above). The smallest squarefree number with gnu(m)=2016 is m=1607970. I do not know whether a smaller cubefree number with this property exists. I am also looking for moa(2017). In this case, I do not even know a number m with gnu(m)=2017. Such a number should exists because in the article in the link above, the existence of the moa-function has been verified upto 10,000,000 (Unfortunately, I found no details how this was done).
2016 and 2017 do not occur among the known gnu-values upto 50000.