search

olivere / elastic

Deprecated: Use the official Elasticsearch client for Go at https://github.com/elastic/go-elasticsearch
https://olivere.github.io/elastic/
MIT License
7.42k stars 1.15k forks source link

ISSUES-1669: Allow 0 value for Version in Bulk Delete Request #1674

Closed garrison-stauffer closed 1 year ago

garrison-stauffer commented 1 year ago

This change addresses the issue outlined in https://github.com/olivere/elastic/issues/1669

0 is a valid value for the external version, but when submitting it for bulk deletes - it is not serialized in json. This PR brings the BulkDeleteRequest to parity with the BulkIndexRequest which was updated in this commit.

garrison-stauffer commented 1 year ago

@olivere apologies for another tag, but this we'd really like to get this change merged in if possible, but acknowledge that this repo is deprecated

olivere commented 1 year ago

@garrison-stauffer Sorry for the late reply. I see what you're after, and if this project would really be actively maintained, I would merge this in a second. However, I've moved on, and doing so would send the signal that this project is still maintained, and people will join the queue and ask for their features to be added (because: "After all, it's just a simple change.").

I've dedicated 7 years of free time from my life to maintain this client, and I'm 💔 to tell people to move on to the official client. But it is like it is: I don't have the capacity to work on this and keep-up or even compete with the Elastic people. So your best bet short-term is to maintain your own fork of the client, and change your code to use the official Go client long-term.

Again, I'm sorry.

P.S.: See here for a longer discussion in the past.

Edit: typos.

garrison-stauffer commented 1 year ago

Hey, just wanted to say thanks for the response. I understand the direction, and while (selfishly) unfortunate, I totally get it.

I appreciate all the work put into this library, easily the best go integration for Elasticsearch by far, and I'm happy to see that its living on through the ES library. Hope we can get some guarantees about where Opensearch will/wont diverge so we'd feel more comfortable using the client going forward, but alas.