Closed sherbondy closed 6 years ago
I remember the issue you are talking about. I honestly can't remember the reasons why this change in 2.x of Lunr, but looking at the docs it seems I did call it out specifically!
I'm not against 'fixing' this regression and would welcome pull requests with such changes ;)
I'll take a look into it myself also, but its not super high on my list of things to work on in Lunr.
Going to close this now as this is documented behaviour (though it has changed during the major version bump from 0/1 to 2).
As mentioned before, I am open to pull requests that support numeric refs, but I don't see myself getting to this anytime soon.
Hi there!
Love the library, but ran into unexpected behavior recently when updating from the ancient 0.6 release to the new-and-shiny 2.1.5 release.
Notably, I was formerly passing in an id ref with a numeric value, and the older lunr.js codebase seemingly left my ref types alone.
Now, refs get coerced into strings once more!
Is this the desired / expected behavior of the library? Is there a new technical/performance reason behind this change related to the introduction of the immutable index?
The Changelog indicates this is a regression from 0.6 where the problem was originally resolved: #117
Simple repro notebook on RunKit just for fun: https://runkit.com/sherbondy/lunr-js-2-1-5-converts-ref-values-to-strings-unexpectedly
Thanks for making lunr!