why not use Nuitka instead of Pyinstaller?

[ExtraMobs]

why not use Nuitka instead of Pyinstaller? It avoids many problems related to importing because the script behaves exactly as written, in addition to optimization, which gives about 20% to 50% more execution speed, allowing for heavier resources in the future.

[TheJackiMonster]

Actually, I didn't know of it yet. Seems like a great option to easily build a compact binary. I'm not sure whether all spellcheckers get bundled properly without issues since they are usually loaded during runtime. But it might make sense to switch to it from PyInstaller.

Do you know whether Nuitka solves the issue that binaries get false flagged as malware on Windows?

[ExtraMobs]

When I compile with Nuitka, Windows rarely reports malware, a guess would be when the binary points out suspicious heuristics for Windows, common binary patterns among viruses, I'm not surprised that Pyinstaller reports this on Windows, after all Pyinstaller is well known, many malware and viruses must use it, so Windows flagging some *.pyd as untrustworthy doesn't surprise me much depending on the library.

[ExtraMobs]

I didn't find anything about grammar checkers in the repository, how does that work? Because if it is a relative import module (sometimes you import it and sometimes you don't), Pyinstaller, when scanning your code, will miss the module and not find it, as I already accused here.