ollie314 / browserscope

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/browserscope
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Custom test results fail to load when browser results not in database #309

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Go to 
http://www.browserscope.org/user/tests/table/agt1YS1wcm9maWxlcnINCxIEVGVzdBiH9N0
EDA?ua=Firefox%203.6,Firefox%202.0 to display HTML5Test results for FF 3.6 and 
FF 2.0
2. Wait for timeout
3. Receive message "Sorry but there was an error..."

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
When in the main browserscope client, if the browser doesn't exist, 
browserscope just loads an empty row (see 
http://www.browserscope.org/?category=summary&v=0&ua=Firefox%203.8 for 
nonexistent FF 3.8).  In the user test results, if the browser doesn't exist in 
the main database, it loads an empty row (see 
http://www.browserscope.org/user/tests/table/agt1YS1wcm9maWxlcnINCxIEVGVzdBiH9N0
EDA?ua=Firefox%203.6,Firefox%203.8 for FF 3.6 and nonexistent FF 3.8).  That 
would be the expected result - display an empty row for the browsers without 
data.

But when the browser exists in the main database (like FF 2.0) but doesn't have 
results in the user test, it gets an error getting the results from the 
database.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Chrome 11, Win7

Please provide any additional information below.
For another example, try 
http://www.browserscope.org/user/tests/table/agt1YS1wcm9maWxlcnINCxIEVGVzdBiH9N0
EDA?ua=Chrome%205.0.375,Chrome%209.0.597,Chrome%2010.0.648,Chrome%2011.0.696,Chr
ome%2012.0.742,Chrome%2013.0.767  Remove Chrome 5 and the results display.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by rasamas...@gmail.com on 20 May 2011 at 9:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I believe this is fixed and working as expected now.
Sorry it took me awhile to check it out, but I think I inadvertently fixed it 
the other day ;0

Original comment by els...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 12:07