Open manili opened 1 year ago
@gatecat did a synthesis test of SERV for ASAP7 about two years ago (see this video around 3:00 https://award-winning.me/serv-for-a-fistful-of-gates/) which indicated it was around 94um2. Note that this is excluding the register file, so you need 128B SRAM for the RF. The good news however is that if you use the Subservient SoC (https://github.com/olofk/subservient/) you only need one single-port SRAM for RF, code and data memories.
@olofk
Although, Subservient SoC
could be a very good candidate for the scheduler (manager), there's still an issue with it to be used as the processor for Many-Core or Symmetric-Multiprocessor architecture, it has different functional units (e.g. GPIO, SPI, ...) which are not essential for the role in the architecture.
What I want to do is connecting thousand of SERV cores and x4 8K-SRAMs together using mesh topology. Manager/Scheduler (which is going to be Subservient SoC) will read the input from outside, program the x4 SRAMs, initialize SERV cores and start the processing. After process has been done by the cores, it will collect the data and send it to the outside.
Now what is the proper SERV candidate/configuration?
I see. To clarify, I didn't really mean using all of subservient, but perhaps the inner layer (subservient_core) if you want to use a combined memory for RF and code+data. If you are fine having a separate memory for the RF, then you can just use serv_rf_top and connect code/data memory + whatever you want to put on the data bus
It sounds like a really cool project btw :)
Thanks a lot @olofk I guess I got what you mean, please correct me if I'm wrong:
Is it correct?
Hi all, What are the minimum requirements of a SERV core to design a many-core ASIC using ASAP7 predictive PDK? I'm thinking about something like SMP architecture and I'm going to use OpenSoC Fabric as the fabric. I will use ~10mm^2 of die area so I can generate a comparable result with Google's MPWs and SKY130 PDK.