Closed jburel closed 8 months ago
from rsync:
-n, --dry-run show what would have been transferred
from patch:
Print the results of applying the patches without actually changing any files.
from make:
Print the commands that would be executed, but do not execute them.
from rsync:
-n, --dry-run show what would have been transferred
from patch:
Print the results of applying the patches without actually changing any files.
from make:
Print the commands that would be executed, but do not execute them.
Like all three ways better than what we have now, but would vote for "patch" or "make" (nr. 2 or 3) rather than "rsync" (nr 1), because nr 1 is using the "would have" which might not be thoroughly practised/understood by non-native english speakers.
In the output of
bin/omero duplicate -h
The following...if the duplicate had been run.
possibly means to say something likejust like if the duplicate was run
. Possibly the complex tense is expressing it, but I would vote for a more down-to-earth formulation. I cannot help thinking that it meansif the duplicate was run
which makes no sense, because this is a--dry-run