Closed manics closed 3 years ago
I am getting increasingly convinced of our upcoming transition to GitHub workflows so no objection from my side. A few questions:
omero-py 5.8.2
?
- Does something need to be activated?
I'm not convinced adding a workflow in a PR always works as expected (or at all?)
- should we try a PyPI release via GitHub action for
omero-py 5.8.2
?
WFM.
I'm not convinced adding a workflow in a PR always works as expected (or at all?)
It usually works for me, but maybe it depends on the repo settings?
I am tempted in that case to trust https://github.com/manics/omero-py/actions/runs/282486285 and merge. Although we probably need to remove at least the Travis deployment step to avoid having 2 places releasing concurrently. Separate PR?
I've removed the deploy step so we can merge it and test the workflow runs as expected. I'll then add the deploy step back and remove travis in the next PR
:+1: a general question I have is about what the name of GitHub workflow should be esp. if there is a single one. Options I can think of workflow.yml
, main.yml
, build.yml
. This does not need ot block this PR for the reasons described above.
I got fed up of waiting for Travis. If we decide to go this route we'll need to setup (and test) the Pypi deploy secrets, and should delete
.travis.yml