Closed joshmoore closed 4 years ago
Is the previous format (list all issues only grouped by repo) still valuable for some usages?
I don't know since I don't think anyone else has looked at it. Happy to support both if you see value.
I don't know since I don't think anyone else has looked at it. Happy to support both if you see value.
I probably rediscovered this command and thought it was nice to be able to review issues by repository. If I was the only known consumer of this implementation, I think adding the option is overkill at this stage. Proposing to cut this as 0.13.0
and extend the formatting options as needed?
Updated:
(py36) /opt/scc $scc external-issues idr
## IDR (3) ##
- [???] [\[celery-example\] How to add task to celery? ](https://github.com/IDR/celery-example/issues/3) (abhiksark)
- [???] [\[idr-notebooks\] Timeout with Human data? ](https://github.com/IDR/idr-notebooks/issues/94) (jrswedlow)
- [???] [\[idr-notebooks\] Upgrade to Python3 code? ](https://github.com/IDR/idr-notebooks/issues/91) (jhermann)
(py36) /opt/scc $scc external-issues idr --by-date
## IDR (3) ##
## 2019-04
- [???] [\[idr-notebooks\] Upgrade to Python3 code? ](https://github.com/IDR/idr-notebooks/issues/91) (jhermann)
## 2019-12
- [???] [\[celery-example\] How to add task to celery? ](https://github.com/IDR/celery-example/issues/3) (abhiksark)
## 2020-01
- [???] [\[idr-notebooks\] Timeout with Human data? ](https://github.com/IDR/idr-notebooks/issues/94) (jrswedlow)
Group issues by month so that the output can be pasted into a gist and reviewed by the team.