Open omkar-tenkale opened 4 years ago
It compressed with 80 quality by default and results look good for camera images Also the blog recommends 80 as a good tradeoff betwen quality and size http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/jpeg-quality
Attach a few samples with poor quality results
Adding a slider here will make things more complex for this tool But moreover it'll just be another compress tool with automatic folder import option
I don't understand the case. The point was in the tool's description says the all photos will be compressed using 70% jpeg.
I've offered to let user choose the quality coz if I convert photo with lots of small details, jpeg can't compress without glitches. The ACDSee by default compress to 85, dashchan to 90%.
Choose folders are make sense. Coz Xiaomi phones add screenshots to dcim and Google photos backup them as photos.
Different photo apps use different folders. You can add the option to "show more". By default shows user the folder which will be scanned.
Or something like this
The point was in the tool's description says the all photos will be compressed using 70% jpeg.
The optimize tool description says its 75% not 70. In code its 80,strings issue,
And 80 is good
I'm planning big improvements for optimize tool. eg name change to something like FOLDER COMPRESS Optimize seems misleading and confusing Custom folder selection option or even multiple folders Custom quality selection option Replace original option Cancel process option, as its a lengthy process with 1000s of images
But this is not planned in next version
This issue will be closed when that's done
ACDSEE recommends 85% for example. It depends of the library version.
Submitted on behalf of Bakli