Closed yrashk closed 6 years ago
Run 2000 deposits with and without it.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 1:27 PM Alexander Kolotov notifications@github.com wrote:
@akolotov commented on this pull request.
@yrashk https://github.com/yrashk could you please advice how to check that this feature works?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#pullrequestreview-125407169, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAABxHCtNCoEV8rLpwO_m53nhh6ihgvaks5t5EaVgaJpZM4UXf3w .
It is not clear for me what is expected?
-- Alexander Kolotov
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM Yurii Rashkovskii notifications@github.com wrote:
Run 2000 deposits with and without it.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 1:27 PM Alexander Kolotov notifications@github.com wrote:
@akolotov commented on this pull request.
@yrashk https://github.com/yrashk could you please advice how to check that this feature works?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#pullrequestreview-125407169 , or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAABxHCtNCoEV8rLpwO_m53nhh6ihgvaks5t5EaVgaJpZM4UXf3w
.
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#issuecomment-394189035, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT1HrNRllW4ZTvYWJVB6r64HnGW9XaLXks5t5Ec3gaJpZM4UXf3w .
One will either take very long time or just timeout, the other will process them in a few seconds or so.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 1:33 PM Alexander Kolotov notifications@github.com wrote:
It is not clear for me what is expected?
-- Alexander Kolotov
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM Yurii Rashkovskii < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Run 2000 deposits with and without it.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 1:27 PM Alexander Kolotov <notifications@github.com
wrote:
@akolotov commented on this pull request.
@yrashk https://github.com/yrashk could you please advice how to check that this feature works?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#pullrequestreview-125407169
, or mute the thread <
.
— You are receiving this because your review was requested. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#issuecomment-394189035>, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AT1HrNRllW4ZTvYWJVB6r64HnGW9XaLXks5t5Ec3gaJpZM4UXf3w
.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/poanetwork/poa-bridge/pull/100#issuecomment-394189270, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAABxENWVp6UZqEOEZLUpdrq-XilJM9sks5t5EgdgaJpZM4UXf3w .
Solution: fix the maximum number of concurrent HTTP request at a transport level.
It is set by default to 64 and there's now a new configuration parameter (
concurrent_http_requests
) inhome
andforeign
sections. Previously usedconcurrency
parameter from transactions configuration has been removed.