Closed yrashk closed 6 years ago
Good idea to keep master in master. Should we remove forked repo and recreate it without the link to upstream?
That's rather a cosmetical decision to make. Either is fine.
👍
Any objections to this one?
@yrashk zero
@yrashk I am waiting for response from @igorbarinov
It is an entirely reversible decision, actually. Up to a point, that is.
I understand this. There is no rush with switching the branch - I do not see how it blocks resolving of any other issues we have.
It only blocks in a sense that if I will be sending pull requests to poa-dev-2 for now I'd need to update this PR, too. to include those, post-merge.
That's why my suggestion is to discuss such kind of proposal before doing actual PR. I like a process when we open an issue, discuss it and implement changes as per discussion.
Discussed the branch swapping with Igor. We will switch our main branch to master
.
poa-dev-2 is not the most obvious place to look for.
Proposed solution: merge it into master.