Open mmtrun opened 3 years ago
Although the demo interface includes examples of both _include and _revinclude, neither seem to affect the results of the query. The following queries, for instance, produce exactly the same output:
<API>/omoponfhir4/fhir/Encounter?_id=34 <API>/omoponfhir4/fhir/Encounter?_id=34&_include=Encounter:patient <API>/omoponfhir4/fhir/Encounter?_id=34&_revinclude=*
Reverse chaining filters ("_has") also appear to be ignored.
Is this expected?
Yes. Those are not yet implemented and ignored. These are pushed back for its low priority in usage.
Although the demo interface includes examples of both _include and _revinclude, neither seem to affect the results of the query. The following queries, for instance, produce exactly the same output:
Reverse chaining filters ("_has") also appear to be ignored.
Is this expected?