Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Replace line 239
$('td:visible div:eq('+n+')',this).css('width',nw);
with
$('td:visible:eq('+n+') div:first',this).css('width',nw);
Original comment by rgmert...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2008 at 11:47
Replace the innerdiv with a table and move a column in front of it.
The fix does not address this
Original comment by rgmert...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2008 at 11:51
here is some table, that does not work
<table class="table-flex">
<thead>
<tr>
<th width="200">col1</th>
<th width="100">col2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><div>1.1</div></td>
<td>1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2.1</td>
<td><table><tr><td>2.2</td></tr></table></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
Original comment by daniel.s...@gmail.com
on 21 Jul 2008 at 4:18
Also note, that the feature of row striping stops to work when a nested table
is in
inside a cell.
Original comment by daniel.s...@gmail.com
on 28 Jul 2008 at 8:48
<table id="x">
<thead>
<tr>
<th width="100px">a</td> </th> -> this is not formatted properly, you closed a td without actually
opening one, plus this my specification requires that you use th in the thead.
<th width="100px">b</td> </th>
<th width="100px">c</td> </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tr>
<td><div>1</div></td>
<td>2</td>
<td>3</td>
</tr>
</table>
Original comment by paulo...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2008 at 10:37
<td><div>1.1</div></td> -> yes this does not work because I handle column resizing using the width
property of div rather the td.
Why?
Because div's are more accurate across different browsers. Some browsers tend
to ignore the width styling of the
cell.
Original comment by paulo...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2008 at 10:39
There is nothing wrong with your decision to use DIVs.. but you have to
consider,
that there are tables, that have nested DIVs as well, where the resizing simply
fails.
Please just copy paste my two examples and give it a try.
Original comment by daniel.s...@gmail.com
on 16 Aug 2008 at 6:25
Original comment by eric.caron
on 22 Dec 2010 at 3:38
Thank you for this solution daniel.soneira... it help me!
Original comment by jupet...@gmail.com
on 20 Oct 2011 at 2:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rgmert...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2008 at 10:43