Support for POTA prefix ending with a digit

[yu3fms]

Hi all, right now FLECli throws error when parsing a pota reference whose prefix ends with a digit.

Processing errors: Parsing error at line 7: Unable to make sense of [HB0-0005]. Parsing error at line 8: Unable to make sense of [E7-0005]. Parsing error at line 9: Unable to make sense of [T9-0005].

So the line at https://github.com/on4kjm/FLEcli/blob/9f0664d0caff81b005cd6b319f9e784d87f35a34/fleprocess/validate.go#L54

should be var validPotaRegexp = regexp.MustCompile(^[\d]{0,1}[A-Z]{1,2}[\d]{0,1}-[\d]{4,5}$)

Rebuild with this change solves the issue. Someone with better knowledge of go regex then mine should look into this.

[jmMeessen]

Thank you for reporting this issue, OM.

Could someone more active than me in POTA activations, point me to the official reference rules documentation? Could maybe kill several flies in one clap.

[jmMeessen]

fixed and released v0.1.7 , @yu3fms

[jmMeessen]

FYI @thomasrussellmurphy if your want to do your Macports magic...

[yu3fms]

Smooth man, thanks!

[thomasrussellmurphy]

I've updated my request on the MacPorts side. Thanks for the updates!

[yu3fms]

Thank you for reporting this issue, OM.

Could someone more active than me in POTA activations, point me to the official reference rules documentation? Could maybe kill several flies in one clap.

Sorry for late response. Rules and docs are officially on https://docs.pota.app I have received list of all the current active unique park references. I will take time this weekend to make a dummy txt file with this data and run a FLECli through it and I will report back with everything.

[w1mt]

Looks like the prefix can be very varied. Look at Sovereign Military Order of Malta for instance 1A0KM is the prefix. The regex to contain all the possibilities is going to be a very complicated object.

[yu3fms]

Heh, indeed the test has not passed with one error. Here are the files:

pota_prefix_test_log.txt flecli_pota_test_log_output.txt

[jmMeessen]

Thank you very much for your interest and providing me test data. I propose to open a new issue (#111) to improve(and finalize) the POTA reference . This will help to keep things tidy (I am experimenting with changelog generation).

[yu3fms]

Thank you for writing this fine piece :) K, we'll move the discussion to #111