Closed msschroeder closed 4 years ago
@msschroeder @cKellyDesign The provided geodata isn't in the format we can work with. We have sourced geometries from hdx but we still have an issue when generating centroids fro this geometries. can we get shapefiles from the clients. This are the errors we get
Feature (6) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (7) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (15) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (16) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (18) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (21) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (27) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (30) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (32) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.
Feature (33) has invalid geometry and has been skipped. Please fix the geometry or change the Processing setting to the "Ignore invalid input features" option.``` when generating the centroids
Experiencing problems currently with the shapefiles. Geometries seem to be invalid.
The first set of shapefiles was from the client. Is there a specific shape file we need from the client - what part?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:52 PM Kelvin Muchiri notifications@github.com wrote:
Experiencing problems currently with the shapefiles. Geometries seem to be invalid.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/onaio/gisida/issues/371?email_source=notifications&email_token=AE6QXSGUODNA2RXIXURGQKDQ7GOIZA5CNFSM4KEEFU42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJXNVMQ#issuecomment-577690290, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE6QXSFPMBAV5G4A7N7JB4TQ7GOIZANCNFSM4KEEFU4Q .
--
Megan Schroeder
Senior Manager - Support and M&E
http://bit.ly/2ckhfuf http://bit.ly/2csSdWW http://bit.ly/2bYdtWl Get your free Ona account http://bit.ly/2buoC12
@msschroeder A shapefile is of a specific format and must have a couple of mandatory files (https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/manage-data/shapefiles/what-is-a-shapefile.htm). Technically among the files, the one we are interested in has a .shp
extension for each administrative boundary.
Unless there is a conversion that we can do to achieve that which I am not aware of that would help us work with the files shared.
Please search humdata.org to see if we can find boundaries for Kiribati
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:58 PM Kelvin Muchiri notifications@github.com wrote:
@msschroeder https://github.com/msschroeder A shapefile is of a specific format and must have a couple of mandatory files ( https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/manage-data/shapefiles/what-is-a-shapefile.htm). Technically among the files, the one we are interested in has a .shp extension.
Unless there is a conversion that we can do to achieve that I am not aware of.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/onaio/gisida/issues/371?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAAOEQJBMA5TE3UJCWKXFF3Q7L6Y7A5CNFSM4KEEFU42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJ3BQIA#issuecomment-578164768, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAOEQLTKLMLJW7TFKSO6BDQ7L6Y7ANCNFSM4KEEFU4Q .
We checked the shapefiles at hdx https://data.humdata.org/dataset/kiribati-administrative-level-0-2-boundaries though there seems to be a problem with the geometries. The data also seems to be quite fresh, (Uploaded 9 days ago) which I presume might be unstable and could be the cause.
I have found a tool that tries to fix the geometries. Let me check if it helps
@msschroeder So Kiribati is extremely very small and the islands are very sparse. The whole country cannot be presented in one view. We had a discussion and a proposal is to have a user select a region like how lotfa works; but then the regions for Kiribati, in this case, will have to be the islands (32 islands). Would you please advise?
This is the whole country https://spa-kiribati.onalabs.org/
This is a single island zoomed in at 3 km
@msschroeder Done: https://spa-kiribati.onalabs.org/
Requestor: Megan - UNICEF Pacific - SPA
Description We need to set up a new GISIDA site for a client.
Create the following layers:
NOTE: Eventually, we may want to add a Canopy Dashboard to the GISIDA site (not sure if that is helpful information)
Shapefiles: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qG6cx0f2RsRe4xnJEVU8uFiJS2RS277C/view?usp=sharing NOTE: I am not sure these are what you need. If they do not work, please let me know. I looked at the files and don't look completely correct?
Dependencies No dependencies
Priority 7-8
Timeline Feb 1st - There is not a huge rush. But it would be nice to get going