Closed JohnMwashuma closed 1 year ago
Merging #416 (2f60ec2) into master (d32461c) will decrease coverage by
0.54%
. The diff coverage is42.10%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #416 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 70.68% 70.15% -0.54%
==========================================
Files 138 139 +1
Lines 9051 9220 +169
==========================================
+ Hits 6398 6468 +70
- Misses 2653 2752 +99
Files Changed | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
tally_ho/libs/models/enums/gender.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
.../tally/views/reports/election_statistics_report.py | 41.07% <41.07%> (ø) |
|
tally_ho/apps/tally/views/super_admin.py | 68.54% <100.00%> (+0.06%) |
:arrow_up: |
tally_ho/urls.py | 96.66% <100.00%> (+0.11%) |
:arrow_up: |
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Looks good, Just a few issues.
The %turnout seems to be off, it seems it calculates it as registrants/voters
while I think it should be voters/registrants.
:
h
======
Also, in the below screenshot:
The total voters are >0
, but male voters + female voters = 0
, this is objectively wierd, I understand there is the Unisex
votes, which if included would make the displayed data be more complete, I however think if I remember correctly the consesus was to split the Unisex between male and female!!!!,
Overview
Election statistics report per election and per ballot.
Context
Implements the report in slide one of this google sheet file https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YnykTc6-MYjokM15VRmZcSWnBS-JESA1eTEhDEivVu8/edit#gid=0
Task check list
CHOICES
option from the gender filter.