Closed mateuszpn closed 1 month ago
Looking at this code again, it seems like we could use a parallel_for instead of a single_task here, as I originally wrote it. Do you want to try switching to parallel_for? It should be embarrassingly parallel.
parallel_for
single_task
Looking at this code again, it seems like we could use a
parallel_for
instead of asingle_task
here, as I originally wrote it. Do you want to try switching toparallel_for
? It should be embarrassingly parallel.