Closed TomMaddox closed 10 years ago
Still some tests to write and more work on the --quiet and --delete-after-complete outputs pending
the implementations of aws.image
and openstack.image
look identical. do we need the split?
No, I guess not. Will refactor
rather than two empty Image
implementations, could we not remove them completely and just rename BaseImage
to Image
and use that?
We could, and we also could for Stack
implementations.
Personally I prefer this style, where each backend clearly follows the same structure as base
. Happy to change for both if you think that's wrong though.
:+1:
Provides the gonzo commands / options:
gonzo instance-launch [--image-name]
gonzo image-create <instance-name> <image-name>
gonzo image-delete <image-name>
gonzo stack-launch [--create-images] [--quiet] [--delete-after-complete]
The intention is to use the latter to capture images of long stack builds overnight, and then use the images for fast stack builds during the day.