bsutton
commented
1 year ago The intended licence is mit.
I will review the statements in the code base to ensure they agree.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022, 8:06 am Eric Seidel, @.***> wrote:
pub.dev lists the dcli package as MIT: https://pub.dev/packages/dcli
GitHub does not list a license for the repository (presumably because the LICENSE files are not at the top level). e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli, compare to https://github.com/flutter/flutter where github clearly notes on the right hand side it's BSD 3-clause.
Various files have "proprietary and confidential" as their header. e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli/blob/master/dcli/lib/dcli.dart
Would love clarity on the intended licensing of this repository and the terms under which the code can/can't be used. Thank you!
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli/issues/210, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG32OECE6SLMQBGXUPYEFDWLZKMJANCNFSM6AAAAAASUXGFEA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
pub.dev lists the dcli package as MIT: https://pub.dev/packages/dcli/license
GitHub does not list a license for the repository (presumably because the LICENSE files are not at the top level). e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli, compare to https://github.com/flutter/flutter where github clearly notes on the right hand side it's BSD 3-clause.
Various files have "proprietary and confidential" as their header. e.g. https://github.com/onepub-dev/dcli/blob/master/dcli/lib/dcli.dart
Would love clarity on the intended licensing of this repository and the terms under which the code can/can't be used. Thank you!