codecov-commenter
commented
6 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 40.06%. Comparing base (
690ccd0) to head (ef5606c).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1473 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 40.06% 40.06% ======================================= Files 51 51 Lines 2908 2908 ======================================= Hits 1165 1165 Misses 1591 1591 Partials 152 152 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/onflow/flow-cli/pull/1473/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=onflow) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/onflow/flow-cli/pull/1473/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=onflow) | `40.06% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=onflow#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
When the new build process was added, it was overlooked that Windows builds were placed in .zip and not .tar.gz. This overrides the behaviour for Windows builds to restore original functionality.
All previous builds have been replaced with .zip & checksums have been updated.