Fix flaky E2E test for EVM state building

[m-Peter]

Description

The random values for the transfer amount, cannot be equal to 0.15 ether, as that is the balance of the test EOAs, and it will cause the transfer transaction to be reverted.

---

For contributor use:

• [x] Targeted PR against master branch
• [x] Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• [x] Code follows the standards mentioned here.
• [x] Updated relevant documentation
• [x] Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
• [x] Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted transfer amounts in the EVM interaction test to prevent exceeding account balances, ensuring test validity.

• Tests

  • Updated test case to reflect new transfer amounts, maintaining the integrity of the simulation for Ethereum transactions.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the transferAmounts array in a test case for Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) interactions. The original amounts of ['0.01', '0.03', '0.05'] totaling 0.09 ether have been changed to ['0.01', '0.02', '0.04'], totaling 0.07 ether. This adjustment ensures that the total transfer amount does not exceed the balance of 0.15 ether for each Externally Owned Account (EOA), thus preventing transaction reversion and maintaining the validity of the test scenario.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
tests/web3js/build_evm_state_test.js	Updated transferAmounts array from ['0.01', '0.03', '0.05'] to ['0.01', '0.02', '0.04'] to ensure total does not exceed EOA balance.

Possibly related PRs

• #239: Modifications to transaction handling in tests may relate to transfer amounts adjustments.
• #277: Updates to batch request tests could be relevant to ensuring valid transfer amounts.
• #289: Changes in streaming test cases may connect with maintaining transaction integrity.
• #314: Introduces validation rules for transaction payloads, aligning with valid transfer amounts.
• #320: Focuses on validating transaction arguments, relevant to transfer amount changes.
• #364: Relaxes validation checks for transaction arguments, possibly related to transfer adjustments.
• #369: Introduces a test case for Multicall3, connecting with transaction handling in EVM tests.

Suggested labels

Bugfix

Poem

🐇 In the land of ether, where transactions flow,
A tweak to the amounts, now balanced they grow.
With careful adjustments, no reversion in sight,
Our tests now run smoothly, all day and all night!
Hooray for the changes, let’s hop with delight,
For valid transactions make everything right! 🎉

[!TIP]

New features

Walkthrough comment now includes: - Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. Notes: - Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.