onflow / flow-jvm-sdk

Flow JVM SDK
Apache License 2.0
16 stars 16 forks source link

#106/ TransactionResult type differs from protobuf schema #116

Closed lealobanov closed 1 month ago

lealobanov commented 1 month ago

Closes: #106

Description

Adds the missing fields to FlowTransactionResult:

As well as missing fields which the Go SDK had but the JVM SDK did not:

For contributor use:

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to documentation and code related to retrieving execution data in the Java and Kotlin examples, as well as modifications to the FlowTransactionResult data class and its associated tests. New sections have been added to the README files for both Java and Kotlin examples, detailing how to get execution data and stream events. Additionally, the FlowTransactionResult class has been enhanced with new properties, and related test cases have been updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
java-example/README.md Added "Get Execution Data" section with a link to the Java example. Adjusted "Examples summary" table.
kotlin-example/README.md Added "Get Execution Data" and "Streaming Events and Execution Data" sections.
sdk/src/main/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models.kt Updated FlowTransactionResult class to include new properties: blockId, blockHeight, transactionId, collectionId, computationUsage.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/FlowAccessApiTest.kt Renamed blockId to flowId and updated related method calls and object constructions.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/models/FlowTransactionResultTest.kt Updated FlowTransactionResult instantiation in tests to include new parameters.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/AsyncFlowAccessApiImplTest.kt Updated FlowTransactionResult instantiation to include new parameters in tests.
sdk/src/test/kotlin/org/onflow/flow/sdk/impl/FlowAccessApiImplTest.kt Updated FlowTransactionResult instantiation and added error handling tests for subscription methods.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure FlowTransactionResult matches protobuf schema (#106)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

🐰 In the meadow, where the data flows,
New sections sprout, as knowledge grows.
With examples bright, and tests refined,
We hop along, with clarity aligned.
Fetching execution, oh what a delight,
In the world of code, we take flight! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Unit Test Results

  53 files  ±0    53 suites  ±0   23s :stopwatch: ±0s 310 tests ±0  310 :heavy_check_mark: ±0  0 :zzz: ±0  0 :x: ±0 

Results for commit 86b1d985. ± Comparison against base commit 86b1d985.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

SDK Examples Unit Test Results

35 files  35 suites   6m 8s :stopwatch: 68 tests 68 :heavy_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x:

Results for commit b1796ae8.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Integration Test Results

  6 files  ±0    6 suites  ±0   2m 34s :stopwatch: ±0s 30 tests ±0  30 :heavy_check_mark: ±0  0 :zzz: ±0  0 :x: ±0 

Results for commit 86b1d985. ± Comparison against base commit 86b1d985.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Common Integration Test Results

1 files  1 suites   7s :stopwatch: 1 tests 1 :heavy_check_mark: 0 :zzz: 0 :x:

Results for commit 81f69ee0.

:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.