Closed mereolog closed 1 year ago
Seems 99,9% of changes look cosmetic replacing some elements like ontohgis:isDefinedByIRI. I see only a few changes related to the initial rdfs:seeAlso splitting. I do not understand how it is related and committed here. @mereolog please explain this approach.
I don't understand why there isDefinedByIRI and isDefinedbyLiteral in the same commit, I thought it was already in the master branch. Is to ok?
What you see in the git diff is the result of difference in serialisations, so an artefact. In order to avoid this you should use https://github.com/edmcouncil/rdf-toolkit.
Seems 99,9% of changes look cosmetic replacing some elements like ontohgis:isDefinedByIRI. I see only a few changes related to the initial rdfs:seeAlso splitting. I do not understand how it is related and committed here. @mereolog please explain this approach.
What you see in the git diff is the result of difference in serialisations, so an artefact. In order to avoid this you should use https://github.com/edmcouncil/rdf-toolkit.
We want to separate the usages of rdfs:seeAlso when it is used to denote an IRI from those that denote a literal.