it would be good to decide in advance how this should be stored with the current pseudo-lisp datastructures. Functional syntax and owlx place annotations as the first argument which is IMHO weird and may be particularly hard to work with using the current untyped structures.
I think the best options are:
break with s-expressions and use a mixed dict/list structure
place axiom annotations as the last argument, and ALWAYS include them, even if [], that way the s-expressions can be evaluated unambiguously
cmungall
commented
10 months ago
It looks like axiom annotations are not included.
it would be good to decide in advance how this should be stored with the current pseudo-lisp datastructures. Functional syntax and owlx place annotations as the first argument which is IMHO weird and may be particularly hard to work with using the current untyped structures.
I think the best options are:
[], that way the s-expressions can be evaluated unambiguously